Understanding the Origin of the Universe
It's difficult for me to understand Rulof's book about the Origin of the Universe.
My main problem at this moment is the sheer unoverseeable time it has taken us to come to Earth, our planet.
From what I have read we started on the Moon. Ok, that's clear to me. It took us millions of years to finish that planet. That's also clear to me.
Alcar already said it's difficult to understand, very difficult That is absoluty true.
I started on the chapter about the second cosmic degree. Alcar stated that after the Moon the next planet was a small planet that could occupy only a seventh of the people that were on the first (and larger) mother planet. He said that planet served to develop the bone structure of the organisms to a solid strong structure. The effect of a smaller planet was that it deforms the organism. Each and every planet had it's own function in the total picture of our evolution. Ok, makes sense to me as well.
But if you add up all those planets where life has gone and have to accept that life has lived millions of years on each single planet it's almost impossible for me to comprehend that. How do you deal with that?
Well, I have to take into consideration that Alcar is a master of the fifth sphere. If I would estimate my own state of development I would say I'd be somewhere between the first and the third sphere of the light. More likely somewhere in the first than the third, I'm not that much of a mister nice guy...
Also life never had the consciousness like we have overhere. The task for mother Moon was only to create substance and awakening. Life there is best described as a great big pool of mud. It had in no way the bright and vivid colors that you see on earth.
Alcar has spent many many years exploring space and the past. He has made that knowledge his property. What made it possible for him to accept that?
He said the masters of the light understand life on earth and the reluctance of people to accept new things that come from outside. He said people only believe something when they see it for themselves. That is true for sure.
And Alcar could see for himself how the universe had originated. In the first place because he lives on the other side, and in the second place because he had worked himself up into the spheres of the light.
What we can see from earth ourself is only the visible cosmos, not the invisible cosmos. People on the other side of life do see the other side too because they are in there themself. So that are two reasons why it is easier to understand if you are on the other side of life then when you are still on earth. Plus the fact that you don't have to convince anyone of life after death because you're already in there.
Also, his story wouldn't be any use if we had figured everything out ourselves here on earth. There is no use in telling a story that everybody knows already.
The book 'The Origin of the Universe' is set up in a special way.
They are telling two stories: 1, the origin of the universe; 2, telling Jozef Rulof who he was in the past.
The point was to convince Jozef Rulof of what they had learnt about the universe and themselves. That way he would know what he was talking about when he would discuss it with other people. He would have to stand in for what he said and wrote.
Alcar did that by telling Andre (Jozef Rulof's name when he left his body) about a friend of him that lived a few hundred years ago on earth. That was an astronomist that desperately wanted to understand space and most of all what was behind that space. When that friend arrived on the other side after his life had finished he saw the reality of life after the coffin. That friend wanted to bring that knowlegde to earth. Alcar helped him to do that.
Gradually, as Alcar brought Andre further in understanding the universe, Andre started to understand who that friend really was. At the end it appeared that the friend was Andre himself.
This sounds pretty easy and nothing special, but the fact is that Andre had made one big mistake in that life that he had to make up for in his last life (as Jozef Rulof).
So what Alcar had done was to gradually wake up Andre and make him aware of who he was before this life and who he was now, why he was there and why he had to be there. That special consciousness made a significant change in Rulof's life. It filled in the blank for Andre from his last life to his present life as Jozef Rulof.
So that is how Andre got to understand the universe and his own past.
This way of telling the story helped me to accept this book. Apart from that it's also very sound what they say and the massive number of books that they produced through Jozef.
Since I have found Rulof's books I didn't have much need anymore for spiritual books from other writers. I've got enough to spend the rest of my life with these books. It is so comprehensive. And structured.
Another reason for me to accept Rulof's supremacy are the paintings that he has left behind. I've got a book with hundreds of reproductions of all his paintings. Rulof said that, like the writing of the books, he never did that himself. It was always the masters of the light that wrote through him or painted through him. And in his last years, when he gave lectures in The Hague, they also spoke through him. That is the most difficult form of trance.
I can't think of any other medium on earth that has come so exceptionaly far. Rulof is unique.
That is why I accept that having difficulties reading Rulof's 'Origin of the Universe' is a matter of my own limited capabilities and not a matter of wrong or false information from Rulof's side, or from the masters sides for that matter.
